1. Introduction
1.1 Scope
1.1.1 This method describes the sampling of hydrogen
peroxide using TiOSO4 and the analysis of hydrogen peroxide
by differential pulse polarography. 1.2 Advantages and
Disadvantages
1.2.1 The analytical method is simple and specific.
1.2.2 The TiOSO4 complex is stable for over seven
weeks. (See the H2O2 backup
report).
1.2.3 The collection of hydrogen peroxide
can be monitored by observing the clear TiOSO4 solution
change to a yellow color when the
TiOSO4-H2O2 complex forms.
1.2.4 The method has better sensitivity than the calorimetric
method (7.1) and has fewer interferences (see
H2O2 backup report). 1.3
Principle (7.4)
1.3.1 The sample is collected using a midget fritted-glass
bubbler containing 15 mL TiOSO4.
1.3.2 The sample
is analyzed for H2O2 by differential pulse
polarography at a dropping mercury electrode. The current (in µA) of
known standards are plotted against the concentrations of the
standards to quantitate the H2O2.
2. Range and Detection Limit
2.1 The detection limit is 0.10 ppm for a 100 L air Sample.
The working analytical range is 5 to 100 µg. 3. Precision and
Accuracy
3.1 Eighteen samples were spiked at three levels
corresponding to levels of 1/2, 1, and 2 times the PEL. The
CV1, (pooled) for the three levels is 0.0261.
4. Interferences
4.1 Very high levels of strong oxidants and reductants will
interfere with the analysis. See the H2O2 backup
report. 5. Sampling
5.1 Apparatus
5.1.1. An air sampling pump capable of operating at
sampling rate of 1.0 L/min. The pump must be properly calibrated so
that the volume of air sampled can be determined accurately from the
flow rate and time.
5.1.2 Midget fritted-glass bubbler.
5.1.3 0.00115 M TiOSO4 collection solution.
5.2 Procedure
5.2.1 Sampling is done in accordance with current
instructions contained in OSHA directives to the industrial hygienist.
5.2.2 The sample is collected in a midget fritted-glass
bubbler containing 10 to 15 mL of 0.00115 M TiOSO4 solution
(6.2.3) using a flow rate of 1.0 liter per minute. A 100 liter air
sample is recommended.
5.2.3 Ship to the laboratory as
soon as possible. Do not use metal capliners in the vial caps and tape
the lids shut. Send one blank with every 10 samples.
6. Analytical Procedure
6.1 Apparatus
6.1.1 25-mL Class A burette with Teflon stopcock.
6.1.2 Glass volumetric pipettes.
6.1.3 Micropipettes
with tips.
6.1.4 125-mL Erlenmeyer flask.
6.1.5
Polargraphic analyzer - model 374 or 384 manufactured by Princeton
Applied Research (PAR) or equivalent.
6.1.6 Static
mercury drop electrode - PAR 303 or- equivalent.
6.1.7 15-mL
glass or polyethylene polargraphic cells.
6.1.8 Nitrogen
purification apparatus. 6.2 Reagents - All chemicals should
be ACS reagent grade or equivalent, and the dilution water must be
deionized.
6.2.1 0.0575 M Titanium Oxysulfate: Add 4.6 g
TiOSO4, 20 g (NH4)2SO4 and
100 mL concentrated H2SO4 to a 500 mL beaker.
See precautions in 6.3.1. Heat gradually for several minutes until the
chemicals are dissolved. Cool the mixture to room temperature and pour
carefully into about 350 mL deionized water in a 500 mL volumetric
flask. Filter the solution through an HA filter to remove any
particulates, and dilute to 500 mL. The solution should be stable for
6 months.
6.2.2 0.00575 N Titanium 0xysulfate: Take a 1-10
dilution of the 0.0575 M TiOSO4 stock solution by
adding 10 mL of the stock solution (6.2.1) to a 100 mL volumetric
flask and diluting to volume with deionized water. This solution
should be made fresh monthly.
6.2.3 0.00575 M Titanium
0xysulfate: Take a 1:50 dilution of the stock TiOSO4
solution (6.2.1) by adding 2 mL of the stock to a 100 mL volumetric
flask and diluting to volume with deionized water. This solution
should be made fresh monthly.
6.2.4 Supporting electrolyte:
Add 53 g (NH4)2SO4, 38 g EDTA, and 75
mL of 28.8% (NH4)OH to about 500 mL deionized water in a
1000 mL volumetric flask. Let cool, then dilute to 1000 mL with D.I.
water.
6.2.5 4 N Sulfuric Acid: Slowly add 112 mL
H2SO4 to about 500 mL deionized water in a 1 L
volumetric flask, stir and let cool. See precautions in 6.3.1. Dilute
to 1 L with deionized water.
6.2.6 Starch indicator solution:
To 5 g starch add a little cold water and grind in a mortar to a thin
paste. Scrape into 1 L of boiling distilled water, stir, and let the
covered solution settle overnight. Decant the clear supernate into a
brown bottle and preserve with 4 g zinc chloride.
6.2.7 0.1 M
Sodium Thiosulfate: Add 24.82 g
Na2S2O3·H20 to about 500
mL deioized water in a 1000 mL volumetric flask and let dissolve.
Dilute to volume deionized water. Add two or three mL chloroform to
minimize bacterial decomposition.
6.2.8 1 M Ammonium
Molybdate: Add 20.6 g
(NH4)6Mo7O24 to about 50
mL deionized water in a 100 mL volumetric flask and dissolve. Dilute
to volume with deionized water. Store in glass.
6.2.9 1
M Potassium Iodide: Add 33.2 g of KI crystals to 100 mL deionized
water, dissolve, and dilute to 1 L. Store in a brown bottle.
6.3 Precautions
6.3.1 When handling mercury, hydrogen peroxide, or
sulfuric acid, gloves and safety glasses must be worn. Extreme care
must be observed to avoid splashing or spilling on skin. Add sulfuric
acid to water very carefully and never add water to sulfuric acid.
Sulfuric acid gives off a great deal of heat when added to water and
can splatter or boil violently. To prevent tile heat from shattering
the volumetric flask, place the flask in a cool water bath and add the
sulfuric acid a little at a time.
6.3.2 Refer to the
polarographic instruction manual for instrumental safety precautions
(7.2, section I-1, and 7.3 section I-1). 6.4 Sample
Preparation
6.4.1 Open the collection vial and measure the sample
volume using a graduated cylinder. Take an aliquot of sample and
transfer to a 15 mL polarographic cell. The sample aliquot size will
depend on the intensity of the color of the collecting solution. If
the sample is very yellow, use a 1 mL aliquot of sample and add 4.0 mL
of the 0.00115 N TiOSO4 (6.2.4) If the sample is colorless,
use a 5 mL aliquot.
6.4.2 Add 5 mL of the supporting
electrolyte (6.2.4) to give a total volume of 10 mL and analyze by
differential pulse polarography. 6.5 Standard
Preparation
6.5.1 A hydrogen peroxide stock solution is prepared by
placing 2 mL of 30% H2O2 in a 500 mL volumetric
flask and diluting to volume with deionized water. This is
approximately 1200 µg/mL H2O2.
6.5.2 A hydrogen peroxide standard solution is prepared by
placing 1 mL of the H2O2 stock (6.5) in a 100 mL
volumetric flask and diluting to volume with deionized water. This is
approximately 12 µg/mL H2O2.
6.5.3
Prepare a series of standards in the analytical range of 6 to 48 µg by
adding the following serial dilutions. Add to the polarographic cell
the appropriate aliquot of the H2O2
standard solution (6.5.2) and aliquots of deionized water using
the calibrated nicropipettes. Add 1 mL of the 0.00575 M
TiOSO4 (6.2.2) and 5 mL of the supporting electrolyte
(6.2.4) to make a total volume of 10 mL.
Stock |
Aliquot |
Aliquot |
Final |
Solution |
H2O2 |
D.I.
H2O |
Standard |
(ppm) |
(mL) |
(mL) |
(µg) |
12 |
4..0 |
0.0 |
48 |
12 |
3.0 |
1.0 |
36 |
12 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
24 |
12 |
1.0 |
3.0 |
12 |
12 |
0.5 |
3.5 |
6 | 6.6 Analysis
6.6.1 Turn on the polarograph, Model 384 and 303 and allow
to warm up for at least 30 minutes.
6.6.2 Analyze the
standards and samples by differential pulse polarography using the
following instrumental conditions:
Initial Potential |
-0.820 V |
Final Potential |
-1.020 V |
Purge Time |
300 sec |
Scan Increment |
2 mV |
Replications |
1 |
Drop Time |
0.5 seconds |
Peak Location |
Yes |
Peak Potential |
-0.940 V |
Date |
as
needed |
This
method is stored as Method No. 2 in the PAR, Model 384.
6.6.3 Prepare the samples and working standard solutions as
described in sections 6.4 and 6.5.
6.6.4 Purge each
standard and sample for 5 minutes pre-purified
nitrogen.
6.6.5 Analyze the reagent blank, standards, and
the samples. A standard should be re-analyzed after every 4 or 5
samples.
6.6.6 Record the peak current and potential for
each standard and sample in the laboratory notebook. The
differential pulse polarogram of hydrogen peroxide gives a peak at
approximately -0.940 V.
6.6.7 If any of the samples have
enough hydrogen peroxide to be over the PEL, the 1200 µg/mL stock
(6.5.1) must be standardized against the 0.1 H sodium thiosulfate
(6.2.7) before a standard curve is prepared. See 6.6.9 through
6.6.12.
6.6.8 Use any available least square regression
program to plot a calibration curve of peak current vs. concentration
(ppm, ppb, or total µg) of the standards.
6.6.9 To
standardize the H2O2 stock solution, transfer
the following solutions to a 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask.
1. 10 mL stock 1200 µg/mL H2O2
(6.5.1)
2. 10 mL 2N H2SO4
(6.2.5)
3. 6 mL 1N KI (6.2.9)
4. 3 drops 1N
(NH4)6Mo7O24 (6.2.8)
5. 20 mL D.I. water 6.6.10 The Solution is
titrated to a very faint yellow with 0.1 N
Na2S2O3 (6.2.7) and then 1 mL starch
solution (6.2.6) is added to produce a blue color. The titration is
continued until the solution becomes colorless.
6.6.11 The
total amount of Na2S2O3 required to
reach the endpoint is determined (about 10 mL) and recorded.
6.6.12 Calculate the concentration of the 1200 µg/mL
H2O2 stock, the 12 µg/mL standard, and the
actual concentrations of the standards to be used in the standard
curve. 6.7
Calculations
6.7.1 Subtract the initial volume of sodium thiosulfate
from the volume at the endpoint. This is the total volume of
Na2S2O3 used.
Since:
2 S2O3= +
H202 + 2 H+ ----->
S4O6 = + 2 H20
Then:
M
Na2S2O3 × V
Na2S2O3 = 2 × M
H2O2 × V H2O2
or:
0.1 × mL Na2S2O3 used = M
H2O2 × 2 × 10 mL, and:
mmoles
H202 = mmoles
Na2S2O3 × 1/2 then:
mg
H2O2 = mmoles Na2S2O3
1/2 ×
34
= mmoles Na2S2O3 × 17
6.7.2 The weight of H2O2 in a sample
aliquot is determined from the calibration curve. The total weight of
H2O2 is calculated front the equation:
µg H2O2 = (aliq. µg - blank aliq.)(sample
vol. mL)
(sample aliquot vol, mL)
6.7.3 The concentration of
H2O2 is calculated in µg/L, converted to
mg/m3, and then to ppm.
µg
H202/liters sampled = mg/m3 and;
ppm H2O2 = mg/m3 ×
24.45/34 = mg/m3 × 0.719 ppm
7. References
7.1 Hydrogen Peroxide Colorimetric Method, Method No: VI-6,
Last Revised on January 26, 1978.
7.2 Instruction Manuals
Polarographic Analyzer, Model 374 and Hanging Mercury Drop
Electrode Model 303, Princeton Applied Research, Princeton,
NJ.
7.3 Polarographic Instruction Manual, Model 384,
Princeton, NJ.
7.4 Boto, K.G., and Williams, L.F.G., Analytical
Chimica Acta, Vol. 85, pp 179-183 (1976).
Backup Data Report
Substance: Hydrogen
Peroxide
OSHA-PEL. 1.0 ppm = TWA
Chemical
used for validation: Hydrogen Peroxide. Analytical Reagent. 30 S.
Wallinckrodt.
1. Procedure
The general procedure used is described in the OSHA Sampling
and Analytical Method (SAM) for hydrogen peroxide. Instrumental analysis
was done by Carl Cook (See Reference 8.1). This method replaces the
colorimetric method (8.2). 2. Analysis
The analysis of hydrogen peroxide is by differential
pulse polarography (DPP). see reference 8.1. 5.0 mL of the supporting
electrolyte and 5.0 ML of the sample or standard solution is placed in a
10 mL sample cell. The sample or standard must be in 5.0 mL 0.00115 M
TiOSO4. This gives a much sharper and larger peak than 4 or
less mL of the 0.00115 M TiOSO4 as can be seen from the
diagram below.
3.
Generation
Hydrogen peroxide was generated by adding 25 ML of 30 %
hydrogen peroxide to a flask and heating the flask while bubbling
N2 through the solution at a rate of 1 LPM. The hydrogen
peroxide was collected in 15 mL of TiOSO4 in a midget fretted
glass bubbler. 4. Collection Efficiency
Hydrogen peroxide was generated for 40 minutes, and while
the 1st impinger collected 500 µg/mL H202 (about
60 times the PEL), the 2nd impinger showed no hydrogen peroxide
collected. This means at levels below 60 times the PEL there is 100 %
collection efficiency. 5. Storage Stability
To assess the stability of hydrogen peroxide in
TiOSO4, a time study was conducted at the 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0
PEL level.
On 1/9/84, 24 samples were prepared for analysis
over a two mouth period to determine the storage stability. Assuming
that 100 L of air were taken in 15 mL TiOSO4, there would be
75 µg H202 found in a sample at 1/2 the PEL. 150
µg at the PEL, and 300 µg at 2 times the PEL. Eight samples
were prepared at each level and contained 15 mL of 0.00115 M
TiOSO4, plus the spiked H202
concentration. Table I gives the results of the stability
study.
Table I Stability Study Data
Day |
µg found |
µg expected |
f/t |
|
|
|
|
1 |
75 |
75 |
1.000 |
1 |
176 |
150 |
1.173 |
1 |
347 |
300 |
1.157 |
4 |
76 |
75 |
1.113 |
4 |
141 |
150 |
0.940 |
4 |
295 |
300 |
0.983 |
8 |
74.9 |
75 |
0.999 |
8 |
149 |
150 |
0.993 |
8 |
300 |
300 |
1.000 |
15 |
91.5 |
75 |
1.220 |
15 |
183 |
150 |
1.220 |
15 |
367 |
300 |
1.223 |
51 |
76.3 |
75 |
1.017 |
51 |
150 |
150 |
1.000 |
51 |
377 |
300 |
1.259 |
From the results it can be seen that hydrogen peroxide is
stable in TiOSO4 for 51 days, or almost 2 months. One problem
that was noticed was that although the hydrogen
peroxide-TiOSO4 complex is stable for two months, the
TiOSO4 stock solution (0.05775 M) and subsequent diluted
solutions of the 0.05775 M TiOSO4 stock solution are not
stable. A comparison of the 0.05775 M QC stock solution and the 0.05775
M Laboratory stock solution showed significant differences. The QC stock
was 12 months old and the lab stock was 3 months old. When analyzed by
the calorimetric method, samples spiked with 96 µg in the QC Stock
showed 80 µg, whereas samples spiked with 96 µg and collected in the lab
stock showed 96 µg. The standards were made using the lab stock
TiOSO4. When the samples were analyzed by DPP, all the
samples showed 96 µg. This is due either to the fact that the QC
stock solution is 9 months older than the lab stock solution or
differences in solution preparation. This points out another problem
with the colorimetric analysis. The results indicate that age and/or
makeup of the TiOSO4 solutions are not as important when the
DPP method is used. 6.
Interferences
Table II shows the effects of different interferents on the
analysis of hydrogen peroxide. 96 µg of hydrogen peroxide was placed in
a 10 mL sample cell along with different levels of interferent. From
Table II it can be seen that the only serious interferent with the DPP
method is KMnO4 which will also prevent the analysis of
hydrogen peroxide using a calorimetric method. Additionally KI does not
effect the analysis of hydrogen peroxide by DPP but does prevent the
analysis or hydrogen peroxide using the colorimetric
method.
Table II Effect of Interferent on the
Analysis of Hydrogen Peroxide
µg
H202 Added |
Interferent
Added |
H202/Interferent ratio |
µA |
Peak
location (V) |
96 |
0.4 ppm
SnCl2 |
1:0.02 |
2.66 |
-0.948 |
96 |
20 ppm
KClO4 |
1:1 |
2.41 |
-0.950 |
96 |
0.2 ppm
KMnO4* |
1:0.01 |
|
|
96 |
0.8 ppm
NH2OH HCl |
1:0.04 |
1.84 |
-0.948 |
96 |
2860 ppm
Na2S2OH·HCl |
1:150 |
2.17 |
-0.950 |
96 |
10 ppm
Cr2O3 |
1:.05 |
2.43 |
-0.948 |
96 |
33200 ppm
KI* |
1:1800 |
2.09 |
-0.950 |
96 |
20 ppm
K2S2O8 |
1:1 |
2.26 |
-0.950 |
*These were highly colored and would not allow analysis by
the colorimetric method. 7.
Precision and Accuracy
The last day of a study was on day 51, the results from day
51 are tabulated below.
# of Samples
Analyzed |
Concentration
Expected |
Concentration |
CV1 |
6 |
75.0 |
76.0 |
0.0312 |
6 |
150.0 |
150.0 |
0.0166 |
6 |
300.0 |
378.0 |
0.0281 |
The CV1 [pooled] for the three sets of samples
was 0.0261. Six samples for each of the three different concentration
ranges were used.
Below are typical polarograms of 120 µg
and 75 µg H202 respectively in a 10-mL sample
cell.
8. References
1. Hydrogen Peroxide in Workplace Atmospheres, Method No:
ID-126-SG.
2. Hydrogen Peroxide Colorimetric Method,
Method No: VI-6, Last Revised on January 26, 1978.
|